Divest of Fossil Fuels
Divestment Minnesota Pension Funds More Info
Please click on the link for Divest-Invest Minnesota to sign the petition:
State Board of Investment (SBI) is meeting in August 2020, at which meeting the Minnesota divestment coalition will be presenting arguments for divesting Minnesota pension funds from fossil fuel holdings. The Minnesota Divestment Coalition is requesting that coalition organizations and members sign on to a letter asking the State Board of Investment to divest from fossil fuels. The DFL Environmental Caucus signed as an organization.
Tell the Minnesota State Board of Investment and your State elected officials:
Now is the time to divest from fossil fuels and invest in clean energy for our children’s future
Why? Because climate change impacts everything.
Historically the Minnesota State Board of Investment (SBI) has invested in fossil fuel companies that are damaging our climate.
We need to persuade SBI officials to divest from these companies that are damaging our climate.
What can you do?
The SBI has a fiduciary duty to those who have entrusted them to guard their pensions. Minnesota public pension holders and taxpayers have a stake in stable, fiscally sound investment policies that respond to accelerating climate instability which will increasingly affect investment decision-making across the globe.
Contact your elected officials at the city, county and state levels and your political party leaders to say you want Minnesota’s public pensions divested from fossil fuels.
Contact your union leaders and retirement system managers if you are a public pension holder and ask them to support divestment.
How are investments made now?
In the past SBI investors have relied on the industry-wide Prudent Person Standard to defend continued investment in fossil fuel companies. Our strategy hinges on the recognition that in fact, correctly interpreted, the Prudent Person Standard compels pension fund fiduciaries to begin to divest from fossil fuels. 
How does the Prudent Person Standard relate to our climate crisis?
For decades, fiduciaries have routinely considered investment in fossil fuel companies to be a prudent financial risk. In the second decade of the 21st century, this can no longer be said to be true.
The climate crisis clearly affects a whole range of circumstances prevailing in our environment NOW. We need to reduce fossil fuel extraction and transport drastically in a critically shortened time frame. Our task is to convince the SBI and Minnesota decision-makers that current circumstances require them to evaluate risks to SBI’s fossil fuel company holdings. Climate change has cascading effects in the market, as returns from transport, processing, and sales of fossil fuels continue to decline, and funds from those industries can be freed up for investment in clean energy alternatives.
Studies show that investments in companies that are engaged in extracting and transporting carbon-intensive products cause harm to ecological systems and increase risks to the stability of the world economy. Those companies are adding to the threat of potential collapse of ecological systems and catastrophic damage to the world economy, including:
severe risk to insurance company assets and liability as a result of costly claims related to the ever-increasing incidence and intensity of rain, hail and snow storms, hurricanes, drought, fire, and flooding -- all caused by increased concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere resulting from burning fossil fuels;
devaluation of real estate value in vulnerable locations such as flooding in river front and coastal areas or those areas impacted by fire, wind, and drought;
rising healthcare costs due to deteriorating air quality, extreme heat, and storm-related injuries and illnesses; and
This means that pension funds are at greater risk in an increasingly unstable investment climate across several different economic sectors: infrastructure, insurance, real estate, health care, agriculture, etc., in addition to continued market declines in the value of fossil fuel assets.
destabilization of government institutions worldwide due to unparalleled migration of climate refugees.
What other risks does climate change pose for investments?
We see that responding to climate change charge prudent investors look at their responsibility in critical evolving ways. It should prompt them to turn away from investing in a company IF:
Assets owned by the company are at risk of becoming stranded due to steady or precipitous reduction in value of the company's assets when investors worldwide decide to participate in reducing atmospheric carbon by moving their investments away from fossil fuels;
A company has fraudulently overvalued its assets by willfully withholding information about harms their products cause to the economy and environment. Those overvalued assets are also at risk.
We are all in this crisis together, and a judicious exit requires responsible actions from all of us, including our fiduciary representatives, to maintain healthy and safe communities in the face of increasing climate instability.
 The Prudent Person Standard is described in Minnesota Statute 356A.04 as:
Prudent person standard. A fiduciary identified in section 356A.02 shall act in good faith and shall exercise that degree of judgment and care, under the circumstances then prevailing, that persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence would exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, considering the probable safety of the plan capital as well as the probable investment return to be derived from the assets.